Oilfield & Energy Services · Case study

15-30% Energy Savings Across 300+ Buildings, With a 2-Year Payback

A proven energy-optimization methodology was capped by senior-engineer headcount. We built the toolkit that let it scale to 300+ buildings worldwide at 15-30% savings and a ~2-year payback.

300+ buildings deployed
15–30% energy cost savings
~2 yr typical payback
Real-time 3D modeling + analytics
The challenge

What they were up against.

A major energy research lab had a methodology that worked. It delivered 15-30% energy savings on commercial and institutional buildings that supposedly already had every cost-effective retrofit in place — a hard result to beat. The problem wasn't the methodology. It was headcount. Optimizing a building's energy performance meant modeling envelopes, simulating internal loads, calibrating HVAC, and tuning operations against weather and occupancy — weeks of work from a senior engineer per project. There were only so many of those engineers, the methodology couldn't scale past them, and there was no monitoring layer to catch performance drift after commissioning.

  • Every project needed a senior engineer for weeks of hands-on analysis
  • Qualified-but-junior engineers couldn't execute the methodology at quality
  • No way to catch performance drift once a building went live
  • A large, untapped market the lab couldn't reach at current headcount
Our approach

How we did it.

01

3D building modeler

Engineers define envelope, internal loads, passive ventilation, air- and water-side systems, and economics.

02

Floor-plan + zone editor

Connects building geometry to mechanical zones.

03

Simulation engine

Runs the energy model so junior engineers produce senior-quality analysis, with senior engineers reviewing and signing off.

04

Real-time monitoring layer

After commissioning, live operational data feeds the same model — comparing estimates to actuals and catching drift.

The outcome

What changed.

The toolkit is now in production across 300+ buildings worldwide — including buildings already considered fully optimized. By calibrating systems with it, the lab promises 15-30% energy savings with a typical payback of around two years. The methodology now scales well beyond the headcount of its senior engineers, and operators get a single, validated ecosystem of energy-saving tools rather than a one-off analysis. Delivered as a Value Sprint and run through AI Office.

What we built

The system.

3D building modeler

Envelope, loads, ventilation, air/water systems, and economics in one model.

Floor-plan & zone editor

Geometry mapped to mechanical zones.

Simulation engine

The energy model that lets junior engineers work at senior quality.

Real-time visualization layer

Live data vs. model — a single source of truth for tuning, training, and manuals.

Get started

Want a result like this? Let’s talk.