15-30% Energy Savings Across 300+ Buildings, With a 2-Year Payback
A proven energy-optimization methodology was capped by senior-engineer headcount. We built the toolkit that let it scale to 300+ buildings worldwide at 15-30% savings and a ~2-year payback.
Result: 300+ buildings deployed · 15–30% energy cost savings · ~2 yr typical payback · Real-time 3D modeling + analytics
What they were up against.
A major energy research lab had a methodology that worked. It delivered 15-30% energy savings on commercial and institutional buildings that supposedly already had every cost-effective retrofit in place — a hard result to beat. The problem wasn't the methodology. It was headcount. Optimizing a building's energy performance meant modeling envelopes, simulating internal loads, calibrating HVAC, and tuning operations against weather and occupancy — weeks of work from a senior engineer per project. There were only so many of those engineers, the methodology couldn't scale past them, and there was no monitoring layer to catch performance drift after commissioning.
- Every project needed a senior engineer for weeks of hands-on analysis
- Qualified-but-junior engineers couldn't execute the methodology at quality
- No way to catch performance drift once a building went live
- A large, untapped market the lab couldn't reach at current headcount
How we did it.
3D building modeler
Engineers define envelope, internal loads, passive ventilation, air- and water-side systems, and economics.
Floor-plan + zone editor
Connects building geometry to mechanical zones.
Simulation engine
Runs the energy model so junior engineers produce senior-quality analysis, with senior engineers reviewing and signing off.
Real-time monitoring layer
After commissioning, live operational data feeds the same model — comparing estimates to actuals and catching drift.
What changed.
- The toolkit is now in production across 300+ buildings worldwide — including buildings already considered fully optimized.
- By calibrating systems with it, the lab promises 15-30% energy savings with a typical payback of around two years. The methodology now scales well beyond the headcount of its senior engineers, and operators get a single, validated ecosystem of energy-saving tools rather than a one-off analysis.
The system.
3D building modeler
Envelope, loads, ventilation, air/water systems, and economics in one model.
Floor-plan & zone editor
Geometry mapped to mechanical zones.
Simulation engine
The energy model that lets junior engineers work at senior quality.
Real-time visualization layer
Live data vs. model — a single source of truth for tuning, training, and manuals.
Other results like this.
12 Systems Into One AML Platform — 75% Fewer False Positives, Zero Regulatory Findings
A financial services firm consolidated 12 fragmented source systems into one audited AML data warehouse, rebuilt detection on top of it, cut false positives 75% — and passed its next regulatory examination with zero findings.
An antiquated platform was costing them their biggest clients — so we rebuilt it
A third-generation credit insurance brokerage was losing the close to better-funded competitors. We replaced the antiquated system, and they kept their biggest clients.
Cutting Admin Time 60% So Vets Could Get Back to Patients
A large equine veterinary practice was losing 30–40% of every vet's day to software that didn't fit how they worked. A purpose-built practice management system cut administrative time by 60% and doubled the horses seen without ballooning staff costs.
Go deeper.
AI Consulting for Operations: A Practical Guide for Operators
Most AI consulting firms are built to advise. A few are built to build and run. Here's how mid-market operators tell the difference before they sign — and the criteria that actually predict delivery.
Best AI Consulting Firms for Operations (2026)
A criteria-based buyer guide for mid-market operators choosing an AI consulting partner that builds and runs production systems — not strategy decks.