Financial Services · Case study

Zero Regulatory Findings on the First AML Audit

A financial services firm consolidated 12 fragmented source systems into one audited AML data warehouse — and passed its first regulatory examination with zero findings.

0 regulatory findings
100% audit pass, first try
12 source systems unified
faster SAR filing
The challenge

What they were up against.

K2 Integrity's compliance team was running anti-money-laundering analysis across 12 separate source systems — each with its own data model, extract process, and interpretation of the same transaction types. Filing a Suspicious Activity Report meant analysts manually reconciling exports from multiple systems: days of work, with human error at every step. Regulators had already flagged the fragmentation in a prior exam — the firm couldn't demonstrate end-to-end transaction coverage, a baseline requirement for any credible AML program. The next examination was 18 months out, and the system had to be operational and demonstrable, not still in development.

  • BSA/AML coverage — demonstrable, auditable coverage of every reportable transaction type across all business lines
  • SAR deadlines — reports due within 30 days of detection; manual processes were consistently at or over the limit
  • Examination risk — continued fragmentation risked Matters Requiring Attention or formal enforcement
  • Operational drag — analysts spending 60% of their time on data reconciliation instead of investigation
Our approach

How we did it.

01

Source-system inventory

Complete mapping of all 12 systems — data models, volumes, extract mechanisms, and coverage gaps. We documented everything before touching anything.

02

Unified data model

A normalized transaction model that accommodated every source type while preserving the audit trail SAR documentation requires.

03

ETL pipeline construction

Reliable, monitored pipelines from each source, with data-quality checks at every stage and alerting on any extraction failure.

04

AML analytics layer

The rule-based and statistical detection models the compliance team needed, plus dashboards for analyst workflow and SAR prep.

The outcome

What changed.

When the examination arrived, the firm demonstrated end-to-end transaction coverage from every source system into a single, audited, documented warehouse. The examiners reviewed the architecture, the data-quality controls, and the detection-model documentation — and issued zero findings on the first try. Beyond compliance, it reset the team's operating model: SAR filing dropped from days to hours, and analyst time on data reconciliation fell from 60% to under 10% — freeing them to do the investigation work they were hired for. Delivered as a Value Sprint and run through AI Office.

What we built

The system.

Unified transaction data warehouse

All 12 source systems consolidated, normalized, validated — with a full audit trail.

12-source ETL pipeline suite

Per-source pipelines with data-quality monitoring, reconciliation checks, and failure alerting.

AML detection engine

Rule-based and statistical models for the firm's risk profile, configurable by compliance without engineering support.

Analyst workflow dashboard

Case management that surfaces flagged transactions, supports investigation, and produces SAR-ready documentation packages.

I can't say enough good things about your team. You really exceeded my expectations. The understanding the team has of our complex business is impressive. We've come a long way and you guys made it happen.
— Omer Khan, Senior Director of Technology, K2 Integrity
Get started

Want a result like this? Let’s talk.